Articles

Why being Catholic today is a radical necessity

or why the left and the right are two symmetrical lies I will put things simply, even if it is unpleasant: the modern world believes itself stuck between two political, moral, and economic options, and it has not seen that both options are false. Not imperfect, not insufficient, …

Read more →

Why holiness is radical, or what are you waiting for exactly?

There is something obscene about our modern relationship with holiness. Not obscene in the vulgar sense, but obscene in the sense of indecent, out of place, out of frame. We look at it the way we watch a wildlife documentary—with curiosity, sometimes admiration, but always from a…

Read more →

Why a paradox is useless - or, God and the omnipotence stone

Why a paradox is useless - or, God and the omnipotence stone

Someone recently threw this at me... I got tired. No need to do anything more.

Read more →

Premise of a Socratic dialogue with myself, or a theatrical why

Premise of a Socratic dialogue with myself, or a theatrical why

Hello, reader. Yes, I'm addressing you. I'm posting this here so I no longer have to keep this dialogue in my head. It's often said that one's greatest enemy is oneself. That's why I started writing on this blog. Writing isn't just about writing for others. In my quest for philo…

Read more →

An effective antidote against captious arguments, or the art of argumentative aikido

An effective antidote against captious arguments, or the art of argumentative aikido

Aikido consists of techniques with weapons and bare hands using the opponent's force, or rather their aggressiveness and will to harm. These techniques aim not to defeat the opponent, but to reduce their attempt at aggression to nothing. I've spoken of my sad tendency to follo…

Read more →

Why Kant broke everything, or the worst rotten gem of all philosophical argumentation

Why Kant broke everything, or the worst rotten gem of all philosophical argumentation

We're in 1985. All of phi- Sorry, wrong start. I hate captious reasoning. One of my acquaintances recently pointed out to me, and rightly so, that being so stressed makes me easily adopt reasoning that appears attractive and true... without realizing it. I dedicate this post to …

Read more →

Why always proportioning belief to evidence isn't necessarily true, or the question of commitments

Why always proportioning belief to evidence isn't necessarily true, or the question of commitments

Article translated from English from J. Chastek's blog. Proposition: If beliefs are proportioned to evidence, commitments are proportioned to evidence. Commitments are either beliefs or have them as an essential principle. Proposition: If commitments are proportioned to evidence…

Read more →

Why saying one believes 'without proof' is an absurdity, or there is always proof

Why saying one believes 'without proof' is an absurdity, or there is always proof

It's been a while since I've written. For lack of clarity, vision, time and motivation. And because I need time to lay out a reflection, stretch it in all directions, properly appropriate it and be able to understand it. And there are so many interesting subjects that I really h…

Read more →

Why God does not exist, or the subtle question of negative theology

Why God does not exist, or the subtle question of negative theology

If you frequently read my posts, you've probably already noticed this quote from one of my favorite thinkers several times: "Deus itaque nescit se quid est, quia non est quid." "God does not know what thing he is, because he is not a thing." John Scotus Eriugena I dare hope th…

Read more →

Why the Church burned Galileo, or you only die twice by historical cliché, volume 1: Galileo, the modern James Bond.

"We are in 1642. January 6, to be exact. And that's when the miracle occurs: the great scientist Galileo Galilei, also known as Galileo in France, has just died for the second time, in his villa in Arcetri, in Florence. Why die for the second time? Because he had already died in …

Read more →